4.8 Article

Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/clay-SO3H hybrid proton exchange membranes for direct methanol fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 185, 期 1, 页码 32-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.004

关键词

DMFCs; SPEEK; Hybrid membranes; Clay; Sulfanilic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new type of sulfonated clay (clay-SO3H) was prepared by the ion exchange method with the sulfanilic acid as the surfactant agent. The grafted amount of sulfanilic acid in clay-SO3H was 51.8 mequiv. (100 g)(-1), which was measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK)/clay-SO3H hybrid membranes which composed of SPEEK and different weight contents of clay-SO3H, were prepared by a solution casting and evaporation method. For comparison, the SPEEK/clay hybrid membranes were produced with the same method. The performances of hybrid membranes for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) in terms of mechanical and thermal properties, water uptake, water retention, methanol permeability and proton conductivity were investigated. The mechanical and thermal properties of the SPEEK membranes had been improved by introduction of clay and clay-SO3H, obviously. The water desorption coefficients of the SPEEK and hybrid membranes were studied at 80 degrees C. The results showed that the addition of the inorganic part into SPEEK membrane enhanced the water retention of the membrane. Both methanol permeability and proton conductivity of the hybrid membranes decreased in comparison to the pristine SPEEK membrane. However, it was worth noting that higher selectivity defined as ratio of proton conductivity to methanol permeability of the SPEEK/clay-SO3H-1 hybrid membrane with 1 Wt.% clay-SO3H was obtained than that of the pristine SPEEK membrane. These results showed that the SPEEK/clay-SO3H hybrid membrane with 1 wt.% clay-SO3H had potential usage of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) for DMFCs. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据