4.1 Article

Fresh look at the Doppler changes in pregnancies with placental-based complications

期刊

JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 138-140

出版社

MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.81880

关键词

Arterial Dopplers; Doppler; ductus venosus; IUGR; IVC; PIH; placental-based pregnancy complications; venous Dopplers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Placental-based complications of pregnancy can be classified as acute and chronic. An example of acute placental complication is abruptio placenta. The chronic placental complications include pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and idiopathic Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The fetus is at risk for perinatal complications in both acute and chronic conditions. Here we take a look at the natural history of the Doppler parameters in chronic conditions. The techniques used for assessing the fetal well-being include, clinical methods, biophysical tests, conventional ultrasonography, and fetal Doppler studies. Arterial Doppler studies are used to assess the well-being of the fetus and to determine the timing of delivery. However, arterial Dopplers predict only the subset of fetuses at risk of having perinatal complications. Venous Dopplers have been used to improve upon the prognostication. However, by the time the commonly used venous Doppler signs, that is, 'A' wave reversal in ductus venosus (DV) is present, the fetus is likely to be already compromised. The fetus tries to adapt to the environment of deprivation by making a series of changes in the umbilical artery circulation, cerebral circulation, and hepatic circulation. As a result of these adaptations, the fetus overcomes the state of chronic hypoxia. This article takes a look at these changes and also the effect of these adaptations. It is suggested that serial comparisons of the venous flow characteristics of the DV and inferior vena cava (IVC) can provide an early indication of the impending decompensation and can be used to predict the time the delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据