4.6 Article

Polylactide (PLA)-Halloysite Nanocomposites: Production, Morphology and Key-Properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 932-943

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-012-0488-4

关键词

Polylactide; Halloysite nanotubes; Nanocomposites; Impact strength

资金

  1. Wallonia Region
  2. Nord-Pas de Calais Region
  3. European Community
  4. Region Wallonne FEDER program (Materia Nova)
  5. OPTI2MAT program of excellence
  6. Interuniversity Attraction Pole program of the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office [PAI 6/27]
  7. FNRS-FRFC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the potential of halloysite nanotubes (HNT) as nanofiller for polylactide (PLA), various nanocomposites have been successfully produced by melt-blending the polyester matrix with HNT (HNT(QM)). HNT were also surface treated by silanization reaction with 3-(Trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate (TMSPM). The morphology, thermal, tensile and impact strength properties of the nanocomposites containing 3-12 % HNT were evaluated and compared to those of pristine (unfilled) PLA. The nanocomposites were characterized by higher rigidity (with Young's modulus increasing with HNT loading), higher tensile strength (about 70 MPa at 6 % HNT(QM)), whereas the elongation at break and impact strength did not decrease. As demonstrated under dynamic solicitation (DMA), melt-blending PLA with HNT led to enhancement of storage modulus (E') and offers the possibility to use PLA in applications requiring higher temperatures of utilization. However, with few exceptions, TGA and DSC measurements did not reveal important changes of thermal parameters. The surface silanization treatment proved to improve the quality of the nanofiller dispersion even at higher loading. As a result, good thermal stability associated to high tensile strength, and noticeable increases in impact properties were recorded. Furthermore, enhanced nucleating ability and crystallization kinetics of the PLA matrix were revealed as specific characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据