4.1 Article

Comparative study of poly(L-lactide) nanocomposites with organic montmorillonite and carbon nanotubes

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/polb.23182

关键词

carbon nanotubes; crystallization; mechanical and thermal properties; organic montmorillonite; poly(L-lactide); rheology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51173151, 50973090]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0823]
  3. Distinguished Young Scholars Foundation of Sichuan [2012JQ0057]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWJTU11CX142, SWJTU11ZT10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic montmorillonite (OMMT) and the one-dimensional functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (FMWCNTs) were introduced into poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) to prepare PLLA/OMMT and PLLA/FMWCNT nanocomposites, respectively. The effects of nanofillers on melt crystallization and cold crystallization of PLLA were comparatively investigated by using polarized optical microcopy, differential scanning calorimetry and wide angle X-ray diffraction. The results show that FMWCNTs exhibit higher nucleation efficiency for the melt crystallization of PLLA, whereas OMMT is the better one for the cold crystallization of PLLA. Rheological properties show that both OMMT and FMWCNTs at relatively higher concentrations can form the percolated network structure in the PLLA matrix, however, the latter nanocomposites exhibit relatively denser or more compact percolated networks. The difference of the networks between OMMT and FMWCNTs is suggested to be the main reason for the different cold crystallization behaviors observed in the PLLA/OMMT and PLLA/FMWCNT nanocomposites. The dynamic mechanical analysis measurements show that OMMT is the better one to improve the stiffness of the nanocomposites in the present work. The thermogravimetric analysis measurements show that FMWCNTs have higher efficiency in improving the thermal stability of PLLA compared with OMMT. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据