4.1 Article

Structural Relaxation of Stacked Ultrathin Polystyrene Films

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/polb.21598

关键词

ageing; glass transition; nanolayers; polystyrene; thin films

资金

  1. NSF [DMR 0304640]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The T-g depression and kinetic behavior of stacked polystyrene ultrathin films is investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and compared with the behavior of bulk polystyrene. The fictive temperature (T-f) was measured as a function of cooling rate and as a function of aging time for aging temperatures below the nominal glass transition temperature (T-g). The stacked ultrathin films show enthalpy overshoots in DSC beating scans which are reduced in height but occur over a broader temperature range relative to the bulk response for a given change in fictive temperature. The cooling rate dependence of the limiting fictive temperature, T-f, is also found to be higher for the stacked ultratbin film samples; the result is that the magnitude of the T-g depression between the ultrathin film sample and the bulk is inversely related to the cooling rate. We also find that the rate of physical aging of the stacked ultrathin films is comparable with the bulk when aging is performed at the same distance from T-g; however, when conducted at the same aging temperature, the ultrathin film samples show accelerated physical aging, that is, a shorter time is required to reach equilibrium for the thin films due to their depressed T-g values. The smaller distance from T-g also results in a reduced logarithmic aging rate for the thin films compared with the bulk, although this is not indicative of longer relaxation times. The DSC heating curves obtained as a function of cooling rate and aging history are modeled using the Tool-Narayanaswamy-Moynihan model of structural recovery; the stacked ultrathin film samples show lower beta values than the bulk, consistent with a broader distribution of relaxation times. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 46: 2741-2753, 2008

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据