4.2 Article

Polysiloxanes polymers with hyperbranched structure and multivinyl functionality

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pola.25072

关键词

ATRP; curing of polymer; functionalization of polymer; hyperbranched; polysiloxanes

资金

  1. Heath Research Board (HRB) of Ireland
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  3. DEBRA Ireland
  4. DEBRA Austria
  5. National University of Ireland, Galway
  6. Australian Research Council [DP0880032]
  7. University of Queensland
  8. Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN)
  9. Australian Research Council [DP0880032] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperbranched polysiloxane polymers with multivinyl functionality were designed and synthesized through a one-step and one-pot deactivation enhanced atom transfer polymerization (DE-ATRP) approach from the copolymerization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) macromonomers and divinylbenzene (DVB). Various feed ratios of siloxane-based monomer and divinyl monomers were investigated. We showed that even at DVB concentrations as high as 80 mol % in the feed, 65% yield of hyperbranched polymer could be obtained without gelation because the DE-ATRP suppressed the rapid formation of macronetwork structures. The molecular weight, polydispersity, macromolecular structure of hyperbranched poly(DVB-co-PDMS) as well as its viscosity in silicone oil were characterized by GPC-MALLS, H-1 NMR and rheometer. By tracking the relationship between the radius of gyration, elution volume and molecular weight from MALLS analysis, solid evidences of the highly branched and condensed structure of the polymers were obtained. Furthermore, the oil thickening experiments demonstrate that this hyperbranched polymer can act as a well-controlled viscosity-modifier for Silicone oils, which potentially will have important application in coating, cosmetic and pharmaceutical products. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 50: 629-637, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据