4.2 Article

Single-Chain Nanoparticles with Well-Defined Structure via Intramolecular Crosslinking of Linear Polymers with Pendant Benzoxazine Groups

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.25003

关键词

benzoxazine; crosslinking; nanoparticles; reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT); single-chain

资金

  1. Shanghai Science & Technology Commission [09JC1414300]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21144006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlled intramolecular collapse of linear polymer chains with crosslinkable groups is an efficient way to prepare single-chain nanoparticles in the size range of 5-20 nm. However, the nature of the crosslinking group is critical. In present study, poly(styrene-co-chloromethyl styrene) [P(St-co-CMS)] was synthesized via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization and then was converted into polystyrene azide (PSAN(3)). Polystyrene containing benzoxazine side groups [P(St-co-BS)], which can be used as the precusor for the later intramolecular collapse, was obtained from PSAN3 and 3-(4-(prop-2-ynyloxy) phenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo [e][1,3] oxazine (P-APPE) via the method of click chemistry. The sub-20 nm polymeric nanoparticles with well-defined structure via thermally intramolecular crosslinking of P(St-co-BS) were prepared. The structure change from the linear polymers to the single-chain nanoparticles was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The morphology and the dimension of the nanoparticles were characterized by using transmission electron microscope (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), as well as dynamic light scattering (DLS). The results reveal that the size of the nanoparticles can be regulated by changing the molecular weight of the precursors and the amount of pendant benzoxazine groups by the use of controlled polymerization techniques. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 49: 5133-5141, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据