4.2 Article

Water-Soluble Triply-Responsive Homopolymers of N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate with a Terminal Azobenzene Moiety

期刊

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/pola.24034

关键词

atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), azo polymers; azobenzene, lower critical solution temperature, photoresponsive, pH-responsive; single-electron transfer living radical polymerization, stimuli-responsive polymer, stimuli-sensitive, polymers, thermoresponsive, water-soluble polymers

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20134020]
  2. Shandong Province of China [2008001]
  3. Shandong Jiaotong University of China [Z200802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel water-soluble triply-responsive homopolymers of N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) containing an azobenzene moiety as the terminal group were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) technique The ATRP process of DMAEMA was initiated by an azobenzene derivative substituted with a 2-bromoisobutyryl group (Azo-Br) in the presence of CuCl/Me(6)TREN in 1,4-dioxane as a catalyst system The molecular weights and their polydispersities of the resulting homopolymers (Azo-PDMAEMA) were characterized by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The homopolymers are soluble in aqueous solution and exhibit a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) that alternated reversibly in response to Ph and photoisomerization of the terminal azobenzene moiety It was found that the LCST increased as pH decreased in the range of testing. Under UV light irradiation, the trans-to-cis photoisomenzation of the azobenzene moiety resulted in a higher LCST, whereas it recovered under visible light irradiation This kind of polymers should be particularly interesting for a variety of potential applications in some promising areas, such as drug controlled-releasing carriers and intelligent materials because of the multistimuli responsive property (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 48 2564-2570, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据