4.2 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Multiblock Copolymers Based on Hydrophilic Disulfonated Poly(arylene ether sulfone) and Hydrophobic Partially Fluorinated Poly(arylene ether ketone) for Fuel Cell Applications

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.23780

关键词

block copolymers; ionomers; morphology; phase separation; poly(ether ketones); poly(ether sulfones)

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG36-06G016038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfonated fluorinated multiblock copolymers based on high performance polymers were synthesized and evaluated for use as proton exchange membranes (PEMs). The multi-block copolymers consist of fully disulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) and partially fluorinated poly(arylene ether ketone) as hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments, respectively. Synthesis of the multiblock copolymers was achieved by a condensation coupling reaction between controlled molecular weight hydrophilic and hydrophobic oligomers. The coupling reaction could be conducted at relatively low temperatures (e.g., 105 degrees C) by utilizing highly reactive hexafluorobenzene (HFB) as a linkage group. The low coupling reaction temperature could prevent a possible trans-etherification, which can randomize the hydrophilic-hydrophobic sequences. Tough ductile membranes were prepared by solution casting and their membrane properties were evaluated. With similar ion exchange capacities (IECs), proton conductivity and water uptake were strongly influenced by the hydrophilic and hydrophobic block sequence lengths. Conductivity and water uptake increased with increasing block length by developing nano-phase separated morphologies. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments revealed that the connectivity of the hydrophilic segments was enhanced by increasing the block length. The systematic synthesis and characterization of the copolymers are reported. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 214-222, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据