4.2 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Sulfonated-Fluorinated, Hydrophilic-Hydrophobic Multiblock Copolymers for Proton Exchange Membranes

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.23194

关键词

block copolymers; copolymerization; fluorinated polymer; nano-phase separation; phase separation; proton exchange membrane; sulfonated polymer

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DEFG 36-06G016038]
  2. UTC [P03561]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrophilic/hydrophobic block copolymers as proton exchange membranes (PEMs) has become an emerging area of research in recent years. These copolymers were obtained through moderate temperature (similar to 100 degrees C coupling reactions, which minimize the ether-ether interchanges between hydrophobic and hydrophilic telechelic oligomers via a nucleophilic aromatic substitution mechanism. The hydrophilic blocks were based on the nucleophilic step polymerization of 3,3'-disulfonated, 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone with an excess 4,4'-biphenol to afford phenoxide endgroups. The hydrophobic (fluorinated) blocks were largely based on decafluoro biphenyl (excess) and various bisphenols. The copolymers were obtained in high molecular weights and were solvent cast into tough membranes, which had nanophase separated hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions. The performance and structure-property relationships of these materials were studied and compared to random copolymer systems. NMR results supported that the multiblock sequence had been achieved. They displayed superior proton conductivity, due to the ionic proton conducting channels formed through the self-assembly of the sulfonated blocks. The nano-phase separated morphologies of the copolymer membranes were studied and confirmed by atomic force microscopy. Through control of a variety of parameters, including ion exchange capacity and sequence lengths, performances as high, or even higher than those of the state-of-the-art PEM, Nafion, were achieved. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 1038-1051, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据