4.2 Article

Surface Modification of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Biocompatible Polymers via Ring Opening and Living Anionic Surface Initiated Polymerization. Kinetics and Crystallization Behavior

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.23491

关键词

anionic polymerization; carbon nanotubes; crystallization; differential scanning calorimetry; grafting; hybrid materials; ring opening polymerization

资金

  1. EU European Social Fund
  2. Greek Ministry of Development GSRT
  3. Ministry of Education through the Operational Program and Initial Educational Vocational Training on Polymer Science and its Applications
  4. Research Committee of the University of Athens
  5. Decanato de Investigacion y Desarrollo [DID-GID-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) were functionalized with 2-hydroxyethyl benzocyclobutene (BCB-EO) through a Diels-Alder cycloaddition reaction. The functionalized MWNTs were utilized for the surface initiated ring opening (ROP) catalyzed and anionic polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone (epsilon-CL) and ethylene oxide (EO), respectively. The kinetics of the ROP of epsilon-CL was monitored through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) which revealed that the polymerization proceeds very fast as compared to that of EO and that both polymerizations could be controlled with time. H-1 NMR, Raman and FTIR spectroscopy, TGA, DSC, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were employed for the characterization of these polymer/CNT hybrids. DSC results showed that a remarkable nucleation effect is produced by MWNTs that reduced the supercooling needed for crystallization of both P epsilon CL and PEO. Furthermore, the isothermal crystallization kinetics of the grafted P epsilon CL and PEO was substantially accelerated compared to the neat polymers. The strong impact on the nucleation and crystallization kinetics is attributed to the covalent MWNT-polymer bonding. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 4379-4390, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据