4.2 Article

Linear and Comb-Like Acrylonitrile/N-Isopropylacrylamide Copolymers Synthesized by the Combination of RAFT Polymerization and ATRP

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.23124

关键词

2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate; atom transfer radical polymerization; comb-like polymer; copolymerization; polyacrylonitrile; poly(N-isopropylacrylamide); reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer; water contact angle

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50625309, 50803053]
  2. National Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [20070421172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the synthesis of three novel thermoresponsive copolymers of acrylonitrile (AN) with N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) by a combination of reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Linear copolymer polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-b-PNIPAM was directly prepared by RAFT polymerization. Comb-like copolymers were synthesized by ATRP using brominated AN/2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate copolymers as macroinitiators, which were prepared by RAFT polymerization. FT-IR, NMR, and GPC were employed to characterize the synthesized copolymers. Results indicate that the polymerization processes can be well controlled and the resultant copolymers have well-defined structures as well as narrow polydispersity. Then dense films were fabricated from these thermoresponsive copolymers and the surface wettability was evaluated by water contact angle measurements at different temperatures. It is found that the surface wettability is temperature-dependant and both the transition temperature and decrement of water contact angle are affected by the copolymer shapes as well as the length of PNIPAM blocks. Considering the excellent fiber- and membrane-forming properties of PAN-based copolymers, the obtained thermoresponsive copolymers are latent materials for functional fibers and membranes. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 92-102, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据