4.2 Article

Synthesis, pH- and temperature-induced micellization and gelation of doubly hydrophilic triblock copolymer of poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethylmethacrylate)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethylmethacrylate) in aqueous solutions

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pola.22904

关键词

atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP); deprotonation; doubly hydrophilic triblock copolymer; gelation; micelles; poly(ethylene glycol); poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethyl methacrylate)

资金

  1. NSF of China [20534020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A doubly hydrophilic triblock copolymer of poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethyl methacrylate)-b-Poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethylmethacrylate) (PDMAEMA-b-PEG-b-PDMAEMA) with well-defined structure and narrow molecular weight distribution (M(w)/M(n) = 1.21) was synthesized in aqueous medium via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of N,N-dimethylarnino-2-ethylmethacrylate (DMAEMA) initiated by the PEG macroinitiator. The macroinitiator and triblock copolymer were characterized with (1)H NMR and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). Fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DSL), transmittance measurement, and rheological characterization were applied to investigate pH- and ternperature-induced micellization in the dilute solution of 1 mg/mL when pH > 13 and gelation in the concentrated solution of 25 wt % at pH = 14 and temperatures beyond 80 degrees C. The unimer of R(h) = 3.7 +/- 0.8 nm coexisted with micelle of R(h) = 45.6 +/- 6.5 nm at pH 14. Phase separation occurred in dilute aqueous solution of the triblock copolymer of 1 mg/mL at about 50 degrees C. Large aggregates with R(h) = 300-450 nm were formed after phase separation, which became even larger as R(h) = 750-1000 nm with increasing temperature. The gelation temperature determined by rheology measurement was about 80 degrees C at pH 14 for the 25 wt % aqueous solution of the triblock copolymer. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据