4.5 Article

Chromosome diversity and evolution in tribe Lilieae (Liliaceae) with emphasis on Chinese species

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 55-69

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-011-0422-1

关键词

China; ITS; Karyotype asymmetry; Secondary constrictions; Lilieae

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070166]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [20090181110064]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007FY110100]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2009-LSF-GBOWS-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, karyotype data of the tribe Lilieae in China were analyzed and been superimposed onto a phylogenetic framework constructed by the internal transcribed spacer to investigate the karyotype evolution. Ten parameters for analyzing karyotype asymmetry were assessed and karyotypic idiogram of five genera of Lilieae were illustrated. The results showed that, the relationship of genera in Lilieae that inferred from Maximum Parsimony criteria and Bayesian Inference were congruent with previous studies, which focused on higher level of Liliales. The karyotype showed distinctive among genera, mainly expressed on the location and amount of secondary constrictions and intercalary satellites: the genus Notholirion have neither of them, and the genera Cardiocrinum and Fritillaria have the secondary constriction alone; the genera Lilium and Nomocharis showed both features, and the distribute pattern of the intercalary satellites showed similarity among related clades. The asymmetry that assessed by several methods indicated that the evolution trend of Lilieae did not follow a single direction, but different in each genus. On the sectional level of the genus Lilium (including Nomocharis) the karyotype evolution included three major periods. Combining the chromosomal structure variations and karyotype asymmetry, the chromosome diversity and evolution in Lilieae were quite clear in the light of molecular inference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据