4.7 Article

Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into the regulation of carbon metabolism during leaf senescence of rice grown under field conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 167, 期 16, 页码 1380-1389

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.05.011

关键词

Carbon metabolism; Leaf senescence; Photosynthesis; Proteomics; Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30725024, 30500312]
  2. State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China [2009CB118503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In rice (Oryza sativa) approximately 60-100% of the carbon in mature grains originates from CO2 assimilation during the grain-filling period with the flag leaf as the most important contributor to the dry weight accumulation in grains It is therefore important to understand molecular mechanisms of flag leaf senescence To investigate the regulation of the metabolic network during leaf senescence changes in protein expression were analyzed using a comparative proteomic approach during senescence of flag leaves in rice grown under field conditions A total of 170 differentially expressed proteins during senescence of flag leaves were identified by mass spectrometry Of these there were 48 down-regulated proteins and 122 up-regulated proteins corresponding to total 124 unique proteins These identified proteins are involved in different cellular responses and metabolic processes including photosynthesis photorespiration glycolysis cell defense redox homeostasis signal transduction protein synthesis folding and assembly Based on the abundance changes of these proteins together with their putative functions and participation in physiological processes we propose protein networks of carbon metabolism at the protein level during leaf senescence These networks illustrate for the first time an overview of the regulations of carbon metabolic reactions occurring during leaf senescence (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据