4.7 Article

Cloning and expression analysis of cDNAs for ABA 8 '-hydroxylase during sweet cherry fruit maturation and under stress conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 167, 期 17, 页码 1486-1493

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.05.027

关键词

Abscisic acid (ABA); CYP707A; Sweet cherry; 8-Hydroxylase; 9-cis-Epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abscisic acid (ABA) plays a key role in various aspects of plant growth and development including adaptation to environmental stress and fruit maturation in sweet cherry fruit In higher plants the level of ABA is determined by synthesis and catabolism In order to gain insight into ABA synthesis and catabolism in sweet cherry fruit during maturation and under stress conditions four cDNAs of PacCYP707A1 - PacCYP707A4 for 8'-hydroxylase a key enzyme in the oxidative catabolism of ABA and one cDNA of PacNCED1 for 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase a key enzyme in the ABA biosynthetic pathway were isolated from sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L) The timing and pattern of PacNCED1 expression was coincident with that of ABA accumulation which was correlated to maturation of sweet cherry fruit All four PacCYP707As were expressed at varying intensities throughout fruit development and appeared to play overlapping roles in ABA catabolism throughout sweet cherry fruit development The application of ABA enhanced the expression of PacCYP707A1 - PacCYP707A3 as well as PacNCED1 but downregulated the PacCYP707A4 transcript level Expressions of PacCYP707A1 PacCYP707A3 and PacNCED1 were strongly increased by water stress No significant differences in PacCYP707A2 and PacCYP707A4 expression were observed between dehydrated and control fruits The results suggest that endogenous ABA content is modulated by a dynamic balance between biosynthesis and catabolism which are regulated by PacNCED1 and PacCYP707As transcripts respectively during fruit maturation and under stress conditions (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据