4.5 Article

Organic matter returns to soils must be higher under organic compared to conventional farming

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201400133

关键词

soil organic matter balance; organic farming; legumes; mineral fertilizer N; farming system comparison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this paper is to discuss the demand of fresh organic matter (FOM) supply to maintain soil organic matter (SOM) levels and productivity of arable soils under organic management. The basic question is whether the different frame conditions in organic vs. conventional farming result in a different and system-specific FOM demand. If this is the case, it would follow that the farming system has to be considered in the calculation of SOM balances. SOM balances are the most common decision support tools in organic matter management. A conversion to organic farming in practice usually leads to an increase of SOM levels as well as soil microbial activity over time. The system-specific driver of this effect is the indispensable extension of the share of (perennial) legumes in crop rotations at the expense of non-legumes such as cereals, row crops, and maize. Extended legume cropping is essential for N supply in crop rotations as the import of N fertilizer in total is limited by organic farming regulations and mineral N fertilizer may not be used at all. Based on this characteristic of organic management, we argue that the demand of FOM supply to soils must be higher than in conventional crop production. The most relevant factors are (1) the non-existence of mineral N fertilizer as an external N source that supports the maintenance of SOM by decreasing the demand for SOM-N, (2) benefits of increasing SOM stocks and turnover for soil productivity under organic management, and, (3) increased mass-losses of FOM and easily degradable SOM compartments due to higher microbial activity in soils. These effects have to be quantified and must be considered in SOM balances in order to avoid misleading assessments and erroneous decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据