4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles changed organic matter quality in a temperate forest soil

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE
卷 171, 期 5, 页码 707-718

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200700334

关键词

biomarker; lignin; sugar; microbial community; climate change; extreme weather events

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under temperate climate, the frequency of extreme weather events such as intensive freezing or frequent thawing periods during winter might increase in the future. It was shown that frost and subsequent thawing may affect the fluxes of C and N in soils. In a laboratory study, we investigated the effect of frost intensity and repeated freeze-thaw cycles on the quality and quantity of soil organic matter (SOM) in a Haplic Podzol from a Norway spruce forest. Undisturbed soil columns comprising O layer and top mineral soil were treated as followed: control (+5 degrees C), frost at -3 degrees C, -8 degrees C, and -13 degrees C. After a 2-week freezing period, frozen soils were thawed at +5 degrees C and irrigated with 80 mm water at a rate of 4 mm d(-1). Lignin contents were not significantly affected by repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) contents decreased in the mineral soil, and PLFA patterns indicate that fungi are more susceptible to soil frost than bacteria. Amounts of both plant and microbial sugars generally decreased with increasing frost intensity. These changes cannot be explained by increased mineralization of sugars or by leaching with DOM nor by a decreased microbial activity and, thus, sugar production with increasing frost intensity. Also physical stabilization of sugars due to frost-induced changes in soil structure can be ruled out as sugar extraction was carried out on ground bulk soil. Therefore, the only possible explanation for the disappearance of plant and microbial sugars upon soil freezing are chemical alterations of sugar molecules leading to SOM stabilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据