4.7 Article

Property of various correlation measures of open Dirac system with Hawking effect in Schwarzschild space-time

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 740, 期 -, 页码 322-328

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.12.008

关键词

Concurrence; Quantum discord; Bell violation; Schwarzschild black hole

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11074002, 61275119]
  2. Doctoral Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20103401110003]
  3. Natural Science Research Project of Education Department of Anhui Province of China [KJ2013A205]
  4. Personal Development Foundation of Anhui Province [2008Z018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the performance of various correlation measures for open Dirac system with Hawking effect in Schwarzschild space-time. Our results indicate that the impact of Hawking effect on physical accessible entanglement is weaker than that of decoherence. For generalized amplitude damping (GAD) channel, the entanglement sudden death (ESD) is analyzed in detail, and the inequivalence of quantization for Dirac particles in the black hole and Kruskal space-time is verified via quantum discord measure. Inaddition, as an example for interpreting Bell non-locality, we study the GAD channel with Hawking effect. It can be noticed that there is a boundary line of Bell violation for physically accessible states. That is, quantum non-locality would disappear when Hawking temperature exceeds a certain value. This critical temperature increases as a decoherence parameter decreases. In the case of phase damping (PD) channel, the interaction between the particle and noise environment does not produce bipartite system-environment entanglement. Then we discuss entanglement distributions, and find that the reduced physically accessible entanglement can be redistributed to physical inaccessible region. At last, we extend our investigation to an N-qubit system, and obtain a universal expression of the physical accessible entanglement. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据