4.4 Article

Overexpressing a novel RING-H2 finger protein gene, OsRHP1, enhances drought and salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 357-365

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12374-013-0481-z

关键词

Abscisic acid; Drought stress; Rice; RING-H2 finger; Salt stress

资金

  1. 973 Program from Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2011CB100401]
  2. Chongqing Local Government [2010AA1019]
  3. National Science Fund of China for Distinguished Young Scientists [30825030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RING (really interesting new gene) zinc-finger proteins have important regulatory roles in the development of a variety of organisms. In the present report, a full length cDNA encoding a novel RING-H2 finger protein from rice, designated as OsRHP1, was isolated and characterized. OsRHP1 encodes a small protein (167 amino acids) with two N-terminal trans-membrane domains and a canonical RING-H2 zinc-finger motif located at the C-terminus. Ten putative homologs of OsRHP1 harboring one canonical RING-H2 finger domain exhibit in other plant species. In our work, OsRHP1 was expressed ubiquitously in various tissues, but its transcript is accumulated more in mature leaf. Compared with wild-type (WT) rice plants, transgenic plants overexpressing OsRHP1 exhibited more tolerance to drought and salt stress. Meanwhile, the transgenic T2 lines showed a significant increase of endogenous ABA content in normal condition. When subjected to drought and salt stress, much stronger accumulation of ABA was detected compared with WT. Furthermore, a significant increase of transcriptional expression, of five ABA biosynthesis or ABA-mediated response genes, OsNCED, OsZEP, OsAAO, OsABI5, OsABF2, OsLEA3-1 were observed in the transgenic plants under drought and salt stress condition. These results demonstrate that overexpression of OsRHP1 substantially enhances drought and salt tolerance through increased ABA level and enhanced ABA-mediated stress response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据