4.4 Article

Fine mapping of Pa-6 gene for purple apiculus in rice

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 218-225

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12374-011-0276-z

关键词

Pa-6; Physical mapping; Purple apiculus; Rice; Single-segment substitution line (SSSL)

资金

  1. China National Natural Science Foundation [31171529, 31000696]
  2. National Program on Research and the Development of Transgenic Plants [2011ZX08001-001, 2009ZX08001-010B]
  3. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, China [2010KF07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purple apiculus is one of the important agronomic traits of rice. Single-segment substitution line (SSSL) W23-07-6-02-14 in the genetic background of an elite rice variety Huajingxian74 (HJX74) with the substituted interval of RM225-RM217-RM253 on the chromosome 6 was found to have purple apiculus (Pa). To map the gene governing Pa, W23-07-6-02-14 was crossed with the recipient HJX74 to develop an F-2 secondary segregation population. The ratio of purple apiculus to green apiculus showed a good fit to 3:1 ratio, indicating that Pa was controlled by a major dominant gene. The gene locus for Pa was tentatively designated as Pa-6. Using 430 individuals from the F-2 segregation population, the Pa-6 locus was mapped between two SSR markers RM19556 and RM19561 with genetic distances of 0.2 and 0.3 cM, respectively. For fine mapping of the Pa-6 gene, a large F-2:3 segregation population of 3890 individuals was developed from F-2 heterzygous plants in the RM19556-RM19561 region. Recombinant analyses further mapped the Pa-6 gene locus to an interval of 41.7-kb bounded L02 and RM19561. Sequence analysis of this 41.7-kb region revealed that it contains eleven open reading frames (ORFs), of which, ORF5 is classified as the one that is associated with the C (chromogen for anthocyanin) gene, it was presumed to be the candidate gene for Pa. This result provided a foundation of map-based cloning and function analysis of the Pa-6 gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据