4.1 Article

Salinity induced oxidative stress and antioxidant system in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13562-012-0107-4

关键词

Antioxidant; Ascorbate; Glutathione; Rice; ROS scavenging enzymes; Salinity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indices of oxidative stress viz., superoxide radical and H2O2 content increased in leaves of all the cultivars with the rise in salinity level, the increase was more pronounced and significant in salt-sensitive varieties and non-significant in resistant cultivars. Except for glutathione reductase (GR), basal activities of all other antioxidative enzymes viz. superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) were significantly higher in leaves of all the resistant cultivars as compared to the sensitive ones. A differential response of salinity was observed on various enzymatic and non-enzymatic components of antioxidant system in leaves of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase enhanced in all the tolerant cultivar while declined in the sensitive cultivars with increasing salinity from 0 to 100 mM. Salt-stress induced the activities of catalase and peroxidase in all the cultivars but the magnitude of increase was more pronounced in the sensitive cultivars than in the tolerant cultivars. Contrarily, APX activity increased in the salt-sensitive cultivars but showed no significant change in the salt-tolerant cultivars. The amount of ascorbic acid content, reduced glutathione (GSH), reduced/oxidized glutathione (GSSG) ratio was higher in leaves of the tolerant cultivars than that of the sensitive cultivars under saline conditions. It is inferred that leaves of salt-tolerant cultivars tend to attain greater capacity to perform reactions of antioxidative pathway under saline conditions to combat salinity-induced oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据