4.3 Article

Grazing by mesozooplankton and microzooplankton on toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis in the Transquaking River, a tributary of Chesapeake Bay

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 415-430

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbq109

关键词

Microcystis; toxic; grazing; zooplankton; mcyD

资金

  1. USEPA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to assess the ability of laboratory-reared and natural communities of zooplankton to graze on toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis during bloom events in the Transquaking River, a tributary of Chesapeake Bay. The dynamics of toxic and non-toxic strains were documented via quantification of the microcystin synthetase gene (mcyD) and ribosomal RNA gene, 16S. During the 2-year field study, Microcystis blooms were comprised of > 10(6) cell equivalents L-1 and the percentage of toxic strains ranged from 1 to 100%. The natural microzooplankton community was able to graze on both strains of Microcystis in two-thirds of experiments, with a slight preference for the non-toxic strains in most experiments. Cultured mesozooplankters (Daphnia pulex and Hyalella azteca) grazed at least one strain (toxic or non-toxic) of Microcystis in only one-third of experiments conducted. In contrast, the wild mesozooplankton community grazed at least one strain of Microcystis in every experiment with electivity indices showing a preference towards toxic strains in most experiments. This finding demonstrates that natural mesozooplankton were better grazers of both toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis than their cultured counterparts. Overall, both microzooplankton and mesozooplankton were capable of grazing toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis with similar success and at similar rates. As such, the ability to synthesize microcystin does not seem to offer toxic Microcystis populations a significant defense against grazing by co-occurring zooplankton communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据