4.3 Article

Differential tolerance of UV radiation between Chaoborus species and role of photoprotective compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 503-513

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbn133

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P19245-BO3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies with larvae of the American species Chaoborus punctipennis suggest that this genus is highly sensitive to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Here, we first tested the UV sensitivity of late-instar larvae of two European Chaoborus species collected from a fishless shallow lake and second assessed their strategies to minimize UV damage. Exposure of late-instar larvae of C. pallidus to artificial UVR caused 50% mortality at a dose of 63.9 J cm(-2). In contrast, no mortality was observed in C. obscuripes at the same or even at a higher dose (85.1 J cm(-2)). Several UV-absorbing compounds identified as mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) were found by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis in C. obscuripes [mean total MAAs: 0.142 mu g mg(-1) dry weight (DW)], but not in C. pallidus. Larvae of C. flavicans also had the same suite of MAAs (shinorine, mycosporine-glycine, palythine, usujirene and palythene) and similar MAAs concentration (0.186 mu g mg(-1) DW) as C. obscuripes, whereas C. crystallinus had very low concentrations (0.008 mu g mg(-1) DW) and only two MAAs. The same suite of MAAs found in larvae of C. obscuripes was also detected in pupae, adult midges and eggs of this species. Whereas C. obscuripes was able to accumulate MAAs through the diet, the origin of these secondary metabolites in the lake remains unclear. Our results indicate that sensitivity to UVR in Chaoborus is species-specific and suggest that resistance in C. obscuripes is associated with the presence of photoprotective compounds. Populations of UV-sensitive Chaoborus species may be at disadvantage in water bodies becoming more transparent to UVR as consequence of climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据