4.3 Article

Distribution of cephalopod paralarvae in relation to the regional oceanography of the western Iberia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 73-91

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbn103

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission
  2. EUROSQUID [AIR1CT92-0573]
  3. SEFOS [AIR2-CT93-1105]
  4. PNAB
  5. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [22-05-01FDR-00013]
  6. NEOMAV
  7. [FAR-MA-1-203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study analyses the distribution of cephalopod paralarvae off the Portuguese coast. The effects of temporal and physical variables on Loligo vulgaris, Octopus vulgaris, sepiolid and ommastrephid abundances are analysed with generalized linear models. Their distribution patterns are discussed in relation to mesoscale features, including currents, thermal fronts and coastal upwelling cross-shelf transport, prevailing in the western Iberia upwelling system. Paralarvae of the neritic species occur during a considerably extended period of the year with two or three abundance peaks within the highly productive upwelling system of the western Portuguese coast and contrasting with the Gulf of Cadiz area. Temperature and upwelling were shown to be the most important variables in modulating seasonality and distribution of these paralarvae. The influence of the physical environment is particularly pronounced for the paralarvae of O. vulgaris, following distinct patterns according to the oceanography of the western Iberia and the Gulf of Cadiz systems. The paralarvae of oceanic species, which in many cases have their northern limit of distribution at these latitudes, were mainly found in the southern part of the sampling area. The distribution of these species indicates that the prevailing oceanographic features of the Gulf of Cadiz system, especially fronts, together with temperature act as boundaries to geographic dispersal, contributing to an area of high cephalopod biodiversity in the southern Portuguese waters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据