4.7 Article

The role of melatonin on gastric mucosal cell proliferation and telomerase activity in ageing

期刊

JOURNAL OF PINEAL RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 308-312

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2009.00715.x

关键词

ageing; cell proliferation; lipid peroxidation; melatonin; stomach; telomerase

资金

  1. Gazi University Research Fund [01/2001-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite antiproliferative effects of melatonin on cultured tumor cells, its effects on normal cells are less clear. The action of melatonin on telomerase activity in ageing of gastric mucosal tissues also is not known. In this study, we investigated the age-related changes in telomerase activity and cellular proliferation rate of gastric mucosa and the effect of melatonin. A total of 37 young (4 months old), and aged (20 months old) Wistar rats, kept under equal periods of light and dark, were divided into control [(PBS), i.p. for 21 days] and melatonin-treated (10 mg/kg melatonin, i.p. for 21 days) groups. Telomerase activity, cell proliferation rate, malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels of the stomach were determined. Melatonin significantly inhibited the gastric mucosal proliferation rate of both young and aged rats. Telomerase activity was significantly reduced in aged rats compared to young animals. Melatonin significantly increased the telomerase activity of both young and aged rats. The MDA levels of gastric mucosa in the aged rats were significantly higher than those of the younger rats. On the contrary, the GSH levels of gastric mucosa of the aged group were significantly lower than that of the young rats. While melatonin had no effect on GSH levels of either young or aged rats, it significantly decreased the MDA levels in aged animals. In conclusion, melatonin may delay the ageing of gastric mucosa by inhibiting the replicative cellular senescence via its stimulatory effect on telomerase activity and suppressive effect on cellular proliferation and lipid peroxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据