4.2 Article

Ultrastructure of the Initial Interaction of Puccinia arachidis and Cercosporidium personatum with Leaves of Arachis hypogaea and Arachis stenosperma

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY
卷 158, 期 11-12, 页码 792-796

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01704.x

关键词

peanut; plant-pathogen interaction; morphology; SEM; late leaf spot; rust

资金

  1. Generation Challenge Program Tropical Legumes 1
  2. Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa - DF (FAPDF)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cultivated peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., is an economically important species. It is very susceptible to different stresses to which wild species are mostly resistant. Foliar diseases, such as late leaf spot (LLS) caused by the fungus Cercosporidium personatum, and rust caused by the fungus Puccinia arachidis, are responsible for decrease in plant growth and productivity. The peanut wild relative Arachis stenosperma accession V10309 was identified as resistant to a number of pests and diseases, including LLS and rust. Aiming to better understand the mechanisms of resistance of A. stenosperma to C. personatum and P. arachidis, determine initial key steps of the plant-pathogen interaction and to contribute for studies on genes involved in this interaction, ultrastructural analysis was performed on leaves of A. stenosperma V10309 (wild, resistant) and A. hypogaea cv. IAC-Tatu (cultivated, susceptible) inoculated with C. personatum or P. arachidis. For both fungal species, adhesion, germination of spores and hyphal proliferation occurred in both species but was more limited and later in A. stenosperma than in A. hypogaea, and no successful penetration was observed in the former. These data suggest that in A. stenosperma, infection is hampered at the stage of penetration. This is the first morphological description of the first hours of the interaction of plant pathogenic fungi and the resistant wild species A. stenosperma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据