4.0 Article

A biologically inspired hierarchical goal directed navigation model

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 28-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.07.002

关键词

Grid cell; Place cell; Hippocampus; Entorhinal cortex; Navigation

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research ONR MURI [N00014-10-1-0936, ONR N00014-09-1-064]
  2. Silvio O. Conte Center [P50 NIMH MH094263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose an extended version of our previous goal directed navigation model based on forward planning of trajectories in a network of head direction cells, persistent spiking cells, grid cells, and place cells. In our original work the animat incrementally creates a place cell map by random exploration of a novel environment. After the exploration phase, the animat decides on its next movement direction towards a goal by probing linear look-ahead trajectories in several candidate directions while stationary and picking the one activating place cells representing the goal location. In this work we present several improvements over our previous model. We improve the range of linear look-ahead probes significantly by imposing a hierarchical structure on the place cell map consistent with the experimental findings of differences in the firing field size and spacing of grid cells recorded at different positions along the dorsal to ventral axis of entorhinal cortex. The new model represents the environment at different scales by populations of simulated hippocampal place cells with different firing field sizes. Among other advantages this model allows simultaneous constant duration linear look-ahead probes at different scales while significantly extending each probe range. The extension of the linear look-ahead probe range while keeping its duration constant also limits the degrading effects of noise accumulation in the network. We show the extended model's performance using an animat in a large open field environment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据