4.6 Article

Reduced corticomotor excitability and motor skills development in children born preterm

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 590, 期 22, 页码 5827-5844

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239269

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [565344, 299087]
  2. South Australian Channel 7 Children's Research Foundation
  3. Women's and Children's Hospital Research Foundation
  4. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms underlying the altered neurodevelopment commonly experienced by children born preterm, but without brain lesions, remain unknown. While individuals born the earliest are at most risk, late preterm children also experience significant motor, cognitive and behavioural dysfunction from school age, and reduced income and educational attainment in adulthood. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional assessments to examine corticomotor development in 151 children without cerebral palsy, aged 1013 years and born after gestations of 2541 completed weeks. We hypothesized that motor cortex and corticospinal development are altered in preterm children, which underpins at least some of their motor dysfunction. We report for the first time that every week of reduced gestation is associated with a reduction in corticomotor excitability that remains evident in late childhood. This reduced excitability was associated with poorer motor skill development, particularly manual dexterity. However, child adiposity, sex and socio-economic factors regarding the child's home environment soon after birth were also powerful influences on development of motor skills. Preterm birth was also associated with reduced left hemisphere lateralization, but without increasing the likelihood of being left handed per se. These corticomotor findings have implications for normal motor development, but also raise questions regarding possible longer term consequences of preterm birth on motor function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据