4.6 Article

The reduction in human motoneurone responsiveness during muscle fatigue is not prevented by increased muscle spindle discharge

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 589, 期 15, 页码 3731-3738

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.210252

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motoneurone excitability is rapidly and profoundly reduced during a sustained maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) when tested in the transient silent period which follows transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex. One possible cause of this reduction in excitability is a fatigue-induced withdrawal of excitatory input to motoneurones from muscle spindle afferents. We aimed to test if muscle spindle input produced by tendon vibration would ameliorate suppression of the cervicomedullary motor-evoked potential (CMEP) in the silent period during a sustained MVC. Seven subjects performed a 2 min MVC of the elbow flexors. Stimulation of the corticospinal tract at the level of the mastoids was preceded 100 ms earlier by TMS. These stimulus pairs were delivered every 10 s during the 2 min MVC. Stimulus pairs at 30, 50, 70, 90 and 110 s were delivered while vibration (similar to 80 Hz) was applied to the distal tendon of biceps. On a separate day, the protocol was repeated with both stimuli delivered to the motor cortex. The CMEP in the silent period decreased rapidly with fatigue (to similar to 9% of control) and was not affected by tendon vibration (P = 0.766). The motor-evoked potential in the silent period also declined rapidly (to similar to 5% of control) and was similarly unaffected by tendon vibration (P = 0.075). These data suggest motoneurone disfacilitation due to a fatigue-related decrease of muscle spindle discharge does not contribute significantly to the profound suppression of motoneurone excitability during the silent period. Therefore, a change to intrinsic motoneurone properties caused by repetitive discharge is most probably responsible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据