4.6 Article

Effects of ageing on single muscle fibre contractile function following short-term immobilisation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 589, 期 19, 页码 4745-4757

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.215434

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Danish National Research Council (Medical Sciences: FSS)
  3. Danish Rheumatology Association
  4. Faculty of Health Sciences
  5. University of Copenhagen
  6. Danish Ministry of Culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Very little attention has been given to the combined effects of healthy ageing and short-term disuse on the contractile function of human single muscle fibres. Therefore, the present study investigated the effects of 2 weeks of lower limb cast immobilisation (i.e. disuse) on selected contractile properties of single muscle fibres (n = 378) from vastus lateralis of nine young (24 +/- 1 years) and eight old (67 +/- 2 years) healthy men with comparable levels of physical activity. Prior to immobilisation, MHC IIa fibres produced higher maximum Ca2+-activated force (approx. 32%) and specific force (approx. 33%) and had lower Ca2+ sensitivity than MHCI fibres (P < 0.05), with no differences between young and old. After immobilisation, the decline in single fibre force (MHC I: young 21% and old 22%; MHC IIa: young 22% and old 30%; P < 0.05) as well as specific force (MHC I: young 14% and old 13%; MHC IIa: young 18% and old 25%; P < 0.05) was more pronounced in MHC IIa fibres compared to MHC I fibres (P < 0.05), with no differences between young and old. Notably, there was a selective decrease in Ca2+ sensitivity in MHC IIa fibres of young (P < 0.05) and in MHC I fibres of old individuals (P < 0.05), respectively. In conclusion, 2 weeks of lower limb immobilisation caused greater impairments in single muscle fibre force and specific force in MHC IIa than MHCI fibres independently of age. In contrast, immobilisation-induced changes in Ca2+ sensitivity that were dependent on age and MHC isoform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据