4.6 Article

Distinct roles for IT and IH in controlling the frequency and timing of rebound spike responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 589, 期 22, 页码 5391-5413

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.215632

关键词

-

资金

  1. AHFMR
  2. CIHR
  3. AIMS
  4. Izaak Walton Killam Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability for neurons to generate rebound bursts following inhibitory synaptic input relies on ion channels that respond in a unique fashion to hyperpolarization. Inward currents provided by T-type calcium channels (I-T) and hyperpolarization-activated HCN channels (I-H) increase in availability upon hyperpolarization, allowing for a rebound depolarization after a period of inhibition. Although rebound responses have long been recognized in deep cerebellar nuclear (DCN) neurons, the actual extent to which I-T and I-H contribute to rebound spike output following physiological levels of membrane hyperpolarization has not been clearly established. The current study used recordings and simulations of large diameter cells of the in vitro rat DCN slice preparation to define the roles for I-T and I-H in a rebound response. We find that physiological levels of hyperpolarization make only small proportions of the total I-T and I-H available, but that these are sufficient to make substantial contributions to a rebound response. At least 50% of the early phase of the rebound spike frequency increase is generated by an I-T-mediated depolarization. An additional frequency increase is provided by I-H in reducing the time constant and thus the extent of I-T inactivation as the membrane returns from a hyperpolarized state to the resting level. An I-H-mediated depolarization creates an inverse voltage-first spike latency relationship and produces a 35% increase in the precision of the first spike latency of a rebound. I-T and I-H can thus be activated by physiologically relevant stimuli and have distinct roles in the frequency, timing and precision of rebound responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据