4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Group III and IV muscle afferents differentially affect the motor cortex and motoneurones in humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 586, 期 5, 页码 1277-1289

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.140426

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of group III and IV muscle afferents on human motor pathways is poorly understood. We used experimental muscle pain to investigate their effects at cortical and spinal levels. In two studies, electromyographic (EMG) responses in elbow flexors and extensors to stimulation of the motor cortex (MEPs) and corticospinal tract (CMEPs) were evoked before, during, and after infusion of hypertonic saline into biceps brachii to evoke deep pain. In study 1, MEPs and CMEPs were evoked in relaxed muscles and during contractions to a constant elbow flexion force. In study 2, responses were evoked during elbow flexion and extension to a constant level of biceps or triceps brachii EMG, respectively. During pain, the size of CMEPs in relaxed biceps and triceps increased (by similar to 47% and similar to 56%, respectively; P < 0.05). MEPs did not change with pain, but relative to CMEPs, they decreased in biceps (by similar to 34%) and triceps (by similar to 43%; P < 0.05). During flexion with constant force, ongoing background EMG and MEPs decreased for biceps during pain (by similar to 14% and 15%; P < 0.05). During flexion with a constant EMG level, CMEPs in biceps and triceps increased during pain (by similar to 30% and similar to 26%, respectively; P < 0.05) and relative to CMEPs, MEPs decreased for both muscles (by similar to 20% and similar to 17%; P < 0.05). For extension, CMEPs in triceps increased during pain (by similar to 22%) whereas MEPs decreased (by similar to 15%; P < 0.05). Activity in group III and IV muscle afferents produced by hypertonic saline facilitates motoneurones innervating elbow flexor and extensor muscles but depresses motor cortical cells projecting to these muscles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据