4.1 Article

Significant roles of microtubules in mature striated muscle deduced from the correlation between tubulin and its molecular chaperone alpha B-crystallin in rat muscles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 149-155

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12576-008-0014-6

关键词

Heat shock protein; Adaptation; Cytoskeleton; Myosin heavy chain; Muscle

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture [15300219]
  2. JST (Japan Science Technology Agency)
  3. RISTEX (Research Institute of Science and Technology)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To elucidate the significance of cytoskeletal microtubule networks in striated muscles, we analyzed correlation between the content of tubulin (building block of microtubules) and alpha B-crystallin (a molecular chaperone for tubulin) in a variety of striated muscles expressing different myosin heavy-chain (MHC) isoforms. The content of both tubulin and alpha B-crystallin was larger in MHC-I dominant soleus muscle and in MHC-alpha dominant cardiac (atrium and ventricle) muscles; intermediate in MHC-IId dominant masseter, tongue, and diaphragm muscles; and smaller in MHC-IIb dominant plantaris, gastrocnemius, psoas, extensor digitorum longus, and tibialis anterior muscles. Since the muscles of slow-type MHC (MHC-I/alpha) show the most economical features in their function and metabolism, which suit for continuous activity required to sustain posture and blood pumping, the present results afforded additional support to our hypothesis that microtubule networks transduce mechanical environmental demands to morphological and biochemical responses that eventually evolve adaptive transformation in the function and metabolism of the mature muscles. The comparison of tubulin/alpha B-crystalline ratios across the muscles of varied MHC isoforms further suggested that mechanical stress fluctuating at the rhythmic frequency of walking and breathing efficiently activates the hypothesized dynamic function of microtubules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据