4.5 Article

Spherical-shell model for the van der Waals coefficients between fullerenes and/or nearly spherical nanoclusters

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 24, 期 42, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/42/424207

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0854769]
  2. NSF under NSF Cooperative Agreement [EPS-1003897]
  3. Louisiana Board of Regents
  4. EPSCoR
  5. Office Of The Director [1003897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fullerene molecules such as C-60 are large nearly spherical shells of carbon atoms. Pairs of such molecules have a strong long-range van der Waals attraction that can produce scattering or binding into molecular crystals. A simplified classical-electrodynamics model for a fullerene is a spherical metal shell, with uniform electron density confined between outer and inner radii (just as a simplified model for a nearly spherical metallic nanocluster is a solid metal sphere or filled shell). For the spherical-shell model, the exact dynamic multipole polarizabilities are all known analytically. From them, we can derive exact analytic expressions for the van der Waals coefficients of all orders between two spherical metal shells. The shells can be identical or different, and hollow or filled. To connect the model to a real fullerene, we input the static dipole polarizability, valence electron number and estimated shell thickness t of the real molecule. Our prediction for the leading van der Waals coefficient C-6 between two C-60 molecules ((1.30 +/- 0.22) x 10(5) hartree bohr(6)) agrees well with a prediction for the real molecule from time-dependent density functional theory. Our prediction is remarkably insensitive to t. Future work might include the prediction of higher-order (e.g. C-8 and C-10) coefficients for C-60, applications to other fullerenes or nearly spherical metal clusters, etc. We also make general observations about the van der Waals coefficients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据