4.5 Article

Elastic relaxations associated with the Pm(3)over-barm-R(3)over-barc transition in LaAlO3: III. Superattenuation of acoustic resonances

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/3/035405

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council of Great Britain [NER/A/S/2000/01055, NE/B505738/1]
  2. NERC [NE/F017081/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F017081/1, NE/B505738/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy has been used to characterize elastic softening and anelastic dissipation processes associated with the Pm (3) over barm. R (3) over barc transition in single crystal and ceramic samples of LaAlO3. Softening of the cubic structure ahead of the transition point is not accompanied by an increase in dissipation but follows different temperature dependences for the bulk modulus, 1/3 (C-11 + 2C(12)), and the shear components, 12 (C-11 - C-12) and C-44, as if the tilting instability contains two slightly different critical temperatures. The transition itself is marked by the complete disappearance of resonance peaks (superattenuation), which then reappear below similar to 700 K in spectra from single crystals. Comparisons with low frequency, high stress data from the literature indicate that the dissipation is not due to macroscopic displacement of needle twins. An alternative mechanism, local bowing of twin walls under low dynamic stress, is postulated. Pinning of the walls with respect to this displacement process occurs below similar to 350 K. Anelasticity maps, analogous to plastic deformation mechanism maps, are proposed to display dispersion relations and temperature/frequency/stress fields for different twin wall related dissipation mechanisms. These allow comparisons to be made of anelastic loss mechanisms under mechanical stress with elastic behaviour observed by means of Brillouin scattering at high frequencies which might also be related to microstructure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据