4.6 Article

On-line 3D motion estimation using low resolution MRI

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 16, 页码 N301-N310

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/16/N301

关键词

deformable image registration; local deformations; resampling; data sufficiency

资金

  1. ITEA (SoRTS) [12026]
  2. European Research Council (Sound Pharma) [ERC-2010-AdG-20100317]
  3. Elekta AB (Stockholm, Sweden)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Image processing such as deformable image registration finds its way into radiotherapy as a means to track non-rigid anatomy. With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiotherapy, intrafraction anatomy snapshots become technically feasible. MRI provides the needed tissue signal for high-fidelity image registration. However, acquisitions, especially in 3D, take a considerable amount of time. Pushing towards real-time adaptive radiotherapy, MRI needs to be accelerated without degrading the quality of information. In this paper, we investigate the impact of image resolution on the quality of motion estimations. Potentially, spatially undersampled images yield comparable motion estimations. At the same time, their acquisition times would reduce greatly due to the sparser sampling. In order to substantiate this hypothesis, exemplary 4D datasets of the abdomen were downsampled gradually. Subsequently, spatiotemporal deformations are extracted consistently using the same motion estimation for each downsampled dataset. Errors between the original and the respectively downsampled version of the dataset are then evaluated. Compared to ground-truth, results show high similarity of deformations estimated from downsampled image data. Using a dataset with (2.5 mm)(3) voxel size, deformation fields could be recovered well up to a downsampling factor of 2, i.e. (5 mm)(3). In a therapy guidance scenario MRI, imaging speed could accordingly increase approximately fourfold, with acceptable loss of estimated motion quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据