4.5 Review

Spin effects in single-electron tunnelling

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 20, 期 42, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/42/423202

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  2. Foundation for Polish Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important consequence of the discovery of giant magnetoresistance in metallic magnetic multilayers is a broad interest in spin-dependent effects in electronic transport through magnetic nanostructures. An example of such systems are tunnel junctions-single-barrier planar junctions or more complex ones. In this review we present and discuss recent theoretical results on electron and spin transport through ferromagnetic mesoscopic junctions including two or more barriers. Such systems are also called ferromagnetic single-electron transistors. We start from the situation when the central part of a device has the form of a magnetic (or nonmagnetic) metallic nanoparticle. Transport characteristics then reveal single-electron charging effects, including the Coulomb staircase, Coulomb blockade, and Coulomb oscillations. Single-electron ferromagnetic transistors based on semiconductor quantum dots and large molecules (especially carbon nanotubes) are also considered. The main emphasis is placed on the spin effects due to spin-dependent tunnelling through the barriers, which gives rise to spin accumulation and tunnel magnetoresistance. Spin effects also occur in the current-voltage characteristics, (differential) conductance, shot noise, and others. Transport characteristics in the two limiting situations of weak and strong coupling are of particular interest. In the former case we distinguish between the sequential tunnelling and cotunnelling regimes. In the strong coupling regime we concentrate on the Kondo phenomenon, which in the case of transport through quantum dots or molecules leads to an enhanced conductance and to a pronounced zero-bias Kondo peak in the differential conductance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据