4.6 Article

Regional assessment of LV wall in infarcted heart using tagged MRI and cardiac modelling

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 4015-4031

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/10/4015

关键词

tagged MRI; cardiac; regional motion; non-rigid image registration; myocardial infarction; deformable model

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia [UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/50]
  2. University of Malaya [RP028-14HTM]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
  4. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [TUBITAK 1001-113E177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A segmental two-parameter empirical deformable model is proposed for evaluating regional motion abnormality of the left ventricle. Short-axis tagged MRI scans were acquired from 10 healthy subjects and 10 postinfarct patients. Two motion parameters, contraction and rotation, were quantified for each cardiac segment by fitting the proposed model using a non-rigid registration algorithm. The accuracy in motion estimation was compared to a global model approach. Motion parameters extracted from patients were correlated to infarct transmurality assessed with delayed-contrast-enhanced MRI. The proposed segmental model allows markedly improved accuracy in regional motion analysis as compared to the global model for both subject groups (1.22-1.40 mm versus 2.31-2.55 mm error). By end-systole, all healthy segments experienced radial displacement by similar to 25-35% of the epicardial radius, whereas the 3 short-axis planes rotated differently (basal: 3.3 degrees; mid: -1 degrees and apical: -4.6 degrees) to create a twisting motion. While systolic contraction showed clear correspondence to infarct transmurality, rotation was nonspecific to either infarct location or transmurality but could indicate the presence of functional abnormality. Regional contraction and rotation derived using this model could potentially aid in the assessment of severity of regional dysfunction of infarcted myocardium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据