4.4 Review

REVIEW OF PARTICLE PHYSICS

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021

关键词

-

资金

  1. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  2. STFC [ST/H001093/2, PP/E000347/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001093/1, ST/H001026/1, ST/G000905/1, ST/G00062X/1, ST/H001069/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E000347/1, ST/H001093/1, ST/G00062X/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001026/1, ST/H001093/2, ST/H001069/1, ST/G000905/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [970173] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Physics [0969445] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Physics [970173] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This biennial Review summarizes much of particle physics. Using data from previous editions, plus 2158 new measurements from 551 papers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons. We also summarize searches for hypothetical particles such as Higgs bosons, heavy neutrinos, and supersymmetric particles. All the particle properties and search limits are listed in Summary Tables. We also give numerous tables, figures, formulae, and reviews of topics such as the Standard Model, particle detectors, probability, and statistics. Among the 108 reviews are many that are new or heavily revised including those on neutrino mass, mixing, and oscillations, QCD, top quark, CKM quark-mixing matrix, V-ud & V-us, V-cb & V-ub, fragmentation functions, particle detectors for accelerator and non-accelerator physics, magnetic monopoles, cosmological parameters, and big bang cosmology. A booklet is available containing the Summary Tables and abbreviated versions of some of the other sections of this full Review. All tables, listings, and reviews (and errata) are also available on the Particle Data Group website: http://pdg.1b1.gov.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据