4.6 Article

Sb2(S1-xSex)3 solar cells: the impact of radiative and non-radiative loss mechanisms

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaddea

关键词

Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3) solar cells; radiative limit; non-radiative recombination; solar cell modeling; minority carrier lifetime

资金

  1. Sener-Conacyt
  2. University of Guadalajara (Programa Especial de Estimulos para Academicos de Reciente Incorporacion con Perfil de Alto Nivel)
  3. COFAA
  4. EDI of IPN
  5. University of Guadalajara (PRO-SNI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The compound Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3) has recently attracted a great deal of attention from the scientific community for solar cell applications. However, Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3) inorganic solar cell efficiencies are still limited to values lower than 7%, further studies contributing to a better understanding of the limiting factors behind this technology being necessary. In particular, no theoretical works on Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3) solar cell modeling have been previously reported. In this work, we present results on Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3 )solar cell modeling under the radiative and non-radiative limits for the first time, where our results are compared to experimental reported data. First, the impact of different Se/(S + Se) compositional ratios and absorber thicknesses on Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3) solar cell parameters under the radiative limit is studied, demonstrating that an efficiency of 29% can be achieved under Sc/(S + Se) compositional ratios in the range of 0.34-0.48 for Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3) thicknesses higher than 1.5 mu m. Furthermore, the impact of different linearly graded band-gaps and a notch-shape configuration of grading are evaluated. In addition, the role of different Sb-2(S1-xSex)(3) minority carrier lifetime values on solar cells is estimated, demonstrating that for absorbers described by minority carrier lifetime values about 10(-9 )s, it would be better to fabricateSb(2)(S1-xSex)(3) solar cells with Se/(S + Se) compositional ratios lower than 0.4. Finally, the influence of low illumination intensity values is presented and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据