4.8 Article

Probing the N=32 Shell Closure below the Magic Proton Number Z=20: Mass Measurements of the Exotic Isotopes 52,53K

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 114, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.202501

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [05P12HGCI1, 05P12HGFNE, 05P09ODCIA]
  2. Max-Planck Society
  3. European Union seventh framework through ENSAR [262010]
  4. French IN2P3
  5. ISOLDE Collaboration
  6. DFG [SFB 634]
  7. Helmholtz Alliance Program [HA216/EMMI]
  8. United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/L005743/1, ST/L005816/1]
  9. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [401945-2011]
  10. GENCI-CCRT [2014-050707, 2015-057392]
  11. DiRAC Data Analytic system at the University of Cambridge (BIS National E-infrastructure capital Contract) [ST/K001590/1]
  12. STFC [ST/H008861/1, ST/H00887X/1, ST/K00333X/1]
  13. Robert-Bosch Foundation
  14. Max-Planck Partner group
  15. STFC [ST/H00887X/1, ST/L005743/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/H008861/1, ST/K001590/1, ST/J000051/1, ST/L005816/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L005743/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/K001590/1, ST/H008861/1, ST/L005816/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/J000051/1, ST/H00887X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recently confirmed neutron-shell closure at N = 32 has been investigated for the first time below the magic proton number Z = 20 with mass measurements of the exotic isotopes K-52,K-53, the latter being the shortest-lived nuclide investigated at the online mass spectrometer ISOLTRAP. The resulting two-neutron separation energies reveal a 3 MeV shell gap at N = 32, slightly lower than for Ca-52, highlighting the doubly magic nature of this nuclide. Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov and ab initio Gorkov-Green function calculations are challenged by the new measurements but reproduce qualitatively the observed shell effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据