4.5 Article

Improvement of ZnO nanorod-based dye-sensitized solar cell efficiency by Al-doping

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF SOLIDS
卷 71, 期 12, 页码 1724-1731

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2010.08.020

关键词

Nanostructures; Semiconductors; Chemical synthesis; Electrical conductivity; electrical properties

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of Education Science and Technology [2009-0093823]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [2005-N-CT-HM-E-01-0000] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0093823] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study investigates the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) based on Al-doped and undoped ZnO nanorod arrays synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method Current density-voltage (J-V) characterizations indicate that Al-doping in ZnO crystal structure can significantly Improve current densities and the energy conversion efficiency (eta) of ZnO nanorod-based DSSCs The maximum eta 1 34% was achieved in DSSC when Al-doped ZnO nanorod arrays were grown in 004 M zinc acetate dihydrate solution with 5 mM aluminum nitrate nonahydrate This result represents a large Increase of eta in Al-doped ZnO nanorod-based DSSCs as compared to undoped (0 05%) The improved DSSC photovoltaic performance can be attributed to two main factors (1) increased light harvesting efficiency due to a large amount of N719 adsorbed on the large surface area of Al-doped ZnO nanorod arrays and (2) increased electrical conductivity due to Al3+ ion doped into the ZnO lattice at the divalent Zn2+ site allowing electrons to move easily into the Al-doped ZnO conduction band (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据