4.8 Article

Fractional Quantum Hall States at ν=13/5 and 12/5 and Their Non-Abelian Nature

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 115, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.126805

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-06ER46305, DE-SC0002140]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1408560]
  3. W. M. Keck Foundation
  4. [MRSEC DMR-1420541]
  5. [PREM DMR-1205734]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [1408560] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [1205734] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topological quantum states with non-Abelian Fibonacci anyonic excitations are widely sought after for the exotic fundamental physics they would exhibit, and for universal quantum computing applications. The fractional quantum Hall (FQH) state at a filling factor of nu = 12/5 is a promising candidate; however, its precise nature is still under debate and no consensus has been achieved so far. Here, we investigate the nature of the FQH nu = 13/5 state and its particle-hole conjugate state at 12/5 with the Coulomb interaction, and we address the issue of possible competing states. Based on a large-scale density-matrix renormalization group calculation in spherical geometry, we present evidence that the essential physics of the Coulomb ground state (GS) at nu = 13/5 and 12/5 is captured by the k = 3 parafermion Read-Rezayi state (RR 3), including a robust excitation gap and the topological fingerprint from the entanglement spectrum and topological entanglement entropy. Furthermore, by considering the infinite-cylinder geometry (topologically equivalent to torus geometry), we expose the non-Abelian GS sector corresponding to a Fibonacci anyonic quasiparticle, which serves as a signature of the RR3 state at 13/5 and 12/5 filling numbers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据