4.6 Article

The growth of minicircle networks on regular lattices

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/45/3/035004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMS-0920887, DMS-0920880, DMS-1016460]
  2. NIH [2S06GM52588-12]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [920880] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0920887] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes is organized into a network of topologically linked minicircles. In order to investigate how key topological properties of the network change with minicircle density, the authors introduced, in an earlier study, a mathematical model in which randomly oriented minicircles were placed on the vertices of the simple square lattice. Using this model, the authors rigorously showed that when the density of minicircles increases, percolation clusters form. For higher densities, these percolation clusters are the backbones for networks of minicircles that saturate the entire lattice. An important relevant question is whether these findings are generally true. That is, whether these results are independent of the choice of the lattices on which the model is based. In this paper, we study two additional lattices (namely the honeycomb and the triangular lattices). These regular lattices are selected because they have been proposed for trypanosomes before and after replication. We compare our findings with our earlier results on the square lattice and show that the mathematical statements derived for the square lattice can be extended to these other lattices qualitatively. This finding suggests the universality of these properties. Furthermore, we performed a numerical study which provided data that are consistent with our theoretical analysis, and showed that the effect of the choice of lattices on the key network topological characteristics is rather small.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据