4.6 Article

A Numerical Study of Salt Fluxes in Delaware Bay Estuary

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 1572-1588

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-12-0124.1

关键词

Baroclinic flows; Dispersion; Fluxes; Mixing

资金

  1. National Science foundation [OCE-0928567, OCE-0825833]
  2. Dupont Fellowship
  3. IMCS at Rutgers University
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0928567] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results of a numerical study of Delaware Bay using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) are presented. The simulations are run over a range of steady river inputs and used M-2 and S-2 tidal components to capture the spring-neap variability. Results provide a description of the spatial and temporal structure of the estuarine exchange flow and the salinity field, as well the along-channel salt flux in the estuary. The along-channel salt flux is decomposed into an advective term associated with the river flow, a steady shear dispersion F-e associated with the estuarine exchange flow, and a tidal oscillatory salt flux F-t. Time series of F-e and F-t show that both are larger during neap tide than during spring. This time variability of F-t, which is contrary to existing scalings, is caused by the lateral flows that bring velocity and salinity out of quadrature and the stronger stratification during neap tide, which causes F-t to be enhanced relative to spring tide. A fit for the salt intrusion length L with river discharge Q for a number of isohalines is performed. The functional dependences of L with Q are significantly weaker than Q(-1/3) scaling. It is concluded that the response of the salt field with river discharge is due to the dependence of F-e and F-t with Q and the relative importance of F-t to the total upstream salt flux: as river discharge increases, F-e becomes the dominant mechanism. Once F-e dominates, the salt field stiffens because of a reduction of the vertical eddy viscosity with increasing Q.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据