4.6 Article

Numerical Wave Modeling in Conditions with Strong Currents: Dissipation, Refraction, and Relative Wind

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 2101-2120

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-11-0220.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Navy EPEL Program
  2. INSU, ANR
  3. ERC [240009]
  4. U.S. National Ocean Partnership Program [N00014-10-1-0383]
  5. FP7 program FIELD-AC
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [240009] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010010] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. NERC [noc010010] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currents effects on waves have led to many developments in numerical wave modeling over the past two decades, from numerical choices to parameterizations. The performance of numerical models in conditions with strong currents is reviewed here, and observed strong effects of opposed currents and modulations of wave heights by tidal currents in several typical situations are interpreted. For current variations on small scales, the rapid steepening of the waves enhances wave breaking. Using different parameterizations with a dissipation rate proportional to some measure of the wave steepness to the fourth power, the results are very different, none being fully satisfactory, which points to the need for more measurements and further refinements of parameterizations. For larger-scale current variations, the observed modifications of the sea state are mostly explained by refraction of waves over currents and relative wind effects, that is, the wind speed relevant for wave generation is the speed in the frame of reference moving with the near-surface current. It is shown that introducing currents in wave models can reduce the errors on significant wave heights by more than 30% in some macrotidal environments, such as the coast of Brittany, in France. This large impact of currents is not confined to the locations where the currents are strongest, but also downwave from strong current gradients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据