4.6 Article

Thermocline Circulation in the Solomon Sea: A Modeling Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1302-1319

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2009JPO4264.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre National d'Etude Spatiales (CNES)
  2. Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD)
  4. GENCI-IDRIS [2009-011279]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the southwest Pacific, thermocline waters connecting the tropics to the equator via western boundary currents (WBCs) transit through the Solomon Sea. Despite its importance in feeding the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) and its related potential influence on the low-frequency modulation of ENSO, the circulation inside the Solomon Sea is poorly documented. A 1/12 degrees model has been implemented to analyze the mean and the seasonal variability of the Solomon Sea thermocline circulation. The circulation involves an inflow from the open southern Solomon Sea, which is distributed via WBCs between the three north exiting straits of the semiclosed Solomon Sea. The system of WBCs is found to be complex. Its main feature, the New Guinea Coastal Undercurrent, splits in two branches: one flowing through Vitiaz Strait and the other one, the New Britain Coastal Undercurrent (NBCU), exiting at Solomon Strait. East of the Solomon Sea, the encounter of the South Equatorial Current (SEC) with the Solomon Islands forms a previously unknown current, which the authors call the Solomon Islands Coastal Undercurrent (SICU). The NBCU, SEC, and SICU participate in the feeding of the New Ireland Coastal Undercurrent (NICU), which retroflects to the Equatorial Undercurrent, providing the most direct western boundary EUC connection, which is particularly active in June August. The Solomon Sea WBC seasonal variability results from the combination of equatorial dynamics, remotely forced Rossby waves north of 10 degrees S, and the spinup and spindown of the subtropical gyre as a response of Rossby waves forced south of 10 degrees S.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据