4.8 Article

Lonely Atoms with Special Gifts: Breaking Linear Scaling Relationships in Heterogeneous Catalysis with Single-Atom Alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 9, 期 18, 页码 5636-5646

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01888

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, CPIMS Program, U.S. Department of Energy [FG02-10ER16170]
  2. EPSRC Doctoral Prize Fellowship [EP/N509577/1]
  3. Integrated Mesoscale Architectures for Sustainable Catalysis (IMASC), an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012573]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant [616121]
  5. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  6. EPSRC [EP/P020194/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discuss a simple yet effective strategy for escaping traditional linear scaling relations in heterogeneous catalysis with highly dilute bimetallic alloys known as single-atom alloys (SAAs). These systems, in which a reactive metal is atomically dispersed in a less reactive host, were first demonstrated with the techniques of surface science to be active and selective for hydrogenation reactions. Informed by these early results, PdCu and PtCu SAA nanoparticle hydrogenation catalysts were shown to work under industrially relevant conditions. To efficiently survey the many potential metal combinations and reactions, simulation is crucial for making predictions about reactivity and guiding experimental focus on the most promising candidate materials. This recent work reveals that the high surface chemical heterogeneity of SAAs can result in significant deviations from Bronsted-Evans-Polanyi scaling relationships for many key reaction steps. These recent insights into SAAs and their ability to break linear scaling relations motivate discovery of novel alloy catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据