4.8 Article

Graphene Oxide Inter layers for Robust, High-Efficiency Organic Photovoltaics

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 2, 期 24, 页码 3006-3012

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jz201493d

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001059]
  2. NSF-MRSEC through the Northwestern University Materials Research Science and Engineering Center for providing characterization facilities [DMR-0520513]
  3. NSF-CAREER [DMR 0955612]
  4. National Defense Science and Engineering
  5. NSF-NSEC
  6. NSF-MRSEC
  7. Keck Foundation
  8. State of Illinois
  9. Northwestern University
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Materials Research [0955612, 1004195, 1121262] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic photovoltaic (OPV) materials have recently garnered significant attention as enablers of high power conversion efficiency (PCE), low-cost, mechanically flexible solar cells. Nevertheless, further understanding-based materials developments will be required to achieve full commercial viability. In particular, the performance and durability of many current generation OPVs are limited by poorly understood interfacial phenomena. Careful analysis of typical OPV architectures reveals that the standard electron-blocking layer, poly-3,4-ethylenedioxy-thiophene:poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), is likely a major factor limiting the device durability and possibly performance. Here we report that a single layer of electronically tuned graphene oxide is an effective replacement for PEDOT:PSS and that it significantly enhances device durability while concurrently templating a performance-optimal active layer pi-stacked face-on microstructure. Such OPVs based on graphene oxide exhibit PCEs as high as 7.5% while providing a 5 x enhancement in thermal aging lifetime and a 20 x enhancement in humid ambient lifetime versus analogous PEDOT:PSS-based devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据